Describe the concept of Moral Relativism Essay

You exhaust no effective to tell me what to do and What is lawful for you is non true for me ar great congresswomans of how we do not always accept the echt truth in life and these statements are both examples of relativism. There are four kinds of relativism metaphysical, epistemological, religious and moral which I am going to let loose close to. Every choice we set about is due to each persons individual morality.Morality is concerned with the free choice of rational ten dollar billder beings, therefore Protagoras shows that there are no moral absolutes when he give tongue to Man is the measure of all things in addition moral relativism is the picture that morality does not relate to any absolute standards of right and ravish but thoroughly and bad are dependent on gloss and circumstance meaning that moral relativism is deontological because it all depends on something being right and wrong.Having a morality may mean that unalike groups of battalion may play different versions of football, in effect(p) like different countries have different legal systems, in addition having a certain moral could just be chosen by the mood that you are in at that certain period of day because moralities accepted at one time may fail to be accepted at another time. What is it for a group or an individual to have a particular morality? In some ways it is like having a particular language with a particular syntax (The arrangement of words and phrases to create grammatic sentences in a language) and also how we use certain vocabulary.Your morality explains something about the way you act and about the way you react to the actions of others. In my reliance moral relativism is very contradictive and a good example of this would be law enforcement within America because we and they say butcher is wrong and their solution is to assassinate the murderer via execution. We say theft is wrong and then take taxes from people without consent. If someone doesnt pay taxes and even resists then they will be judged as being morally wrong even though they are doing moral wrongness themselves.Moving on, normative ethics is the main sentiment of moral relativism because it is the examination of issues of right and wrong and how people justify the ending they make when faced with situations of moral choice an example of this would be the ten commandments because they are a set of rules to stop us from being get off lead in life. In addition a great example of this would be when morality is determined by situations, for example, manufacturing is wrong. But lying to the Nazis where the Jews are is right.Since situations are relative and changing, then morality is relative and changing, save morality is not always determined by situations but well-educated by it for example murder is wrong, but one must murder someone for self-defence. So therefore this situation makes a deed right, cleaning for self-defence makes killing not murder. Therefo re killing for self-defence is not wrong. Another point people think is true is that good intentions is enough. It is not. Hitler had good intentions, but his actions were not. A good intention can make a deed good, but a good intention does not make a bad deed good.